[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130228142440.GA6328@cachalot>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:24:40 +0400
From: Vasily Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: For review: pid_namespaces(7) man page
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> The namespace init process
> The first process created in a new namespace (i.e., the process
> created using clone(2) with the CLONE_NEWPID flag, or the first
> child created by a process after a call to unshare(2) using the
> CLONE_NEWPID flag) has the PID 1, and is the "init" process for
> the namespace (see init(1)). Children that are orphaned within
> the namespace will be reparented to this process rather than
> init(1).
Probably it worth noting here that this is true unless
prctl() with PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER option is called.
Thanks,
--
Vasily Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists