[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:40:29 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare
uretprobe
On 02/28, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ struct uprobe_task {
> enum uprobe_task_state state;
> struct arch_uprobe_task autask;
>
> + /*
> + * list for tracking uprobes with return consumers
> + */
> + struct hlist_head return_uprobes;
Forgot to mention, at least you should also change uprobe_free_utask()
to cleanup this list, the task can exit from inside the ret-probe'd
function(s).
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists