[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130304104916.GC32740@bandura.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:49:16 +0100
From: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare
uretprobe
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:40:29PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/28, Anton Arapov wrote:
> >
> > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ struct uprobe_task {
> > enum uprobe_task_state state;
> > struct arch_uprobe_task autask;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * list for tracking uprobes with return consumers
> > + */
> > + struct hlist_head return_uprobes;
>
> Forgot to mention, at least you should also change uprobe_free_utask()
> to cleanup this list, the task can exit from inside the ret-probe'd
> function(s).
Yes, right. Thanks for the other mails as well. I will fix it for the
next RFC v4.
Anton.
> Oleg.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists