[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201303051546.13636.poeschel@lemonage.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:46:13 +0100
From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, rob@...dley.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pwm: add sysfs interface
At first: Thanks for your review!
On Monday 25 February 2013 at 05:00:25, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:27:41PM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> > +static int pwmchip_export(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + int status;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
> > + dev = device_create(&pwm_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
> > + "pwmchip%d", chip->base);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(dev))
> > + status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &pwmchip_attr_group);
> > + else
> > + status = PTR_ERR(dev);
>
> You can't create sysfs files after the device has been exposed to
> userspace. Please use the default group functionality for the class,
> which fixes this problem.
I don't understand, what is wrong here. This is the same that gpio sysfs
does. Could you please be a bit more specific ?
I create a new device using device_create and create a new group with it with
some attributes. Isn't it exposed to userspace after that ?
Or am I not allowed to use pwm_class on device creation ? What to use then ?
What do you mean by default group functionality for the class ? I want to use
my own "pwm" class ? Don't I ?
Regards,
Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists