lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130305213416.GA10758@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 05:34:16 +0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
Cc:	Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>,
	thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, rob@...dley.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pwm: add sysfs interface

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:46:13PM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> At first: Thanks for your review!
> 
> On Monday 25 February 2013 at 05:00:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:27:41PM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> > > +static int pwmchip_export(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > > +{
> > > +	int status;
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
> > > +	dev = device_create(&pwm_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
> > > +				"pwmchip%d", chip->base);
> > > +	if (!IS_ERR(dev))
> > > +		status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &pwmchip_attr_group);
> > > +	else
> > > +		status = PTR_ERR(dev);
> > 
> > You can't create sysfs files after the device has been exposed to
> > userspace.  Please use the default group functionality for the class,
> > which fixes this problem.
> 
> I don't understand, what is wrong here. This is the same that gpio sysfs 
> does. Could you please be a bit more specific ?
> I create a new device using device_create and create a new group with it with 
> some attributes. Isn't it exposed to userspace after that ?

The device was exposed to userspace when you called device_create(), so
any program is then free to start looking for attributes.  It will not
find them because you haven't created them yet.

To prevent this race from happening, use the default attribute group for
the class to create the attributes before the device is announced to
userspace by the driver core.

That is what the dev_attrs pointer is for in 'struct class'.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ