linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/31] workqueue: introduce workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:34:34 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com,
	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/31] workqueue: introduce workqueue_attrs

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:33:27PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Ryan.
> 
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:29:35AM +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> > > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
> > >  	struct mutex		assoc_mutex;	/* protect POOL_DISASSOCIATED */
> > >  	struct ida		worker_ida;	/* L: for worker IDs */
> > >  
> > > +	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* I: worker attributes */
> > 
> > If attrs always exists, why not just embed the struct and avoid the
> > need to alloc/free it?
> 
> Because then it'll need a separate init paths for embedded ones.  If
> the field was in any way hot, I'd have embedded it but it isn't and
> it's just less code to share the alloc path.

Ooh, right, and that cpumask_t is going away and you can't statically
allocate cpumask_var_t, so it needs an allocation and error check from
it anyway.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/