linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201303052234.32723.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2013 22:34:32 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries

On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >
> > Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> >
> > Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
> > to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
> > from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
> > suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
> > multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
> > that though.
> 
> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
> version it will go into.
> 

Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
in 3.10 as well.

Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
but it doesn't feel right.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/