[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo==-3oqocx-7fbrYx=cFZJ9vgVZ1di3v2T8TZcissbf5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:48:54 +0800
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Fix
sampling_down_factor functionality
On 6 March 2013 06:06, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> wrote:
> sampling_down_factor tunable is unused since commit
> 8e677ce83bf41ba9c74e5b6d9ee60b07d4e5ed93 (4 years ago).
>
> This patch restores the original functionality and documents the
> tunable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> ---
> Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt | 6 ++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists