lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:49:50 +0800 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency decrease checking On 6 March 2013 06:06, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> wrote: > When we evaluate the CPU load for frequency decrease we have to compare > the load against down_threshold. There is no need to subtract 10 points > from down_threshold. > > Instead, we have to use the default down_threshold or user's selection > unmodified. > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists