[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130307153736.GC4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:37:36 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] cpufreq: exynos: Adding cpufreq driver for
exynos5440
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:28:00PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 05:13 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> > + dvfs_info->cpu_clk = devm_clk_get(dvfs_info->dev, "armclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dvfs_info->cpu_clk)) {
>
> devm_clk_get() return value needs to be checked with IS_ERR(),
> not IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>
> > + pr_err("Failed to get cpu clock\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(dvfs_info->cpu_clk);
> > + goto err_free_table;
Amit, to illustrate why this is wrong, consider this:
1. Set cpu_clk to NULL.
2. Realise IS_ERR_OR_NULL(NULL) is true.
3. What is the value of PTR_ERR(NULL) ?
4. What effect does that have when you jump to err_free_table ?
5. What value is returned from this function in that case ?
6. What does that return value mean to the driver core ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists