linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:45:30 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com,
	zab@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register()

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:57:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, guys.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had
> > > much time to think about this.
> > >
> > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me.
> > 
> > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of
> > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that
> > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way,
> 
> How should this be routed?  I can take it but Kay needs it too so
> workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a
> separate branch if needed.

What patch set does Kay need it for?  I have no objection for you to
take it through the workqueue tree:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/