| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130310164530.GA4523@kroah.com> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:45:30 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register() On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:57:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hey, guys. > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had > > > much time to think about this. > > > > > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me. > > > > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of > > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that > > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way, > > How should this be routed? I can take it but Kay needs it too so > workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a > separate branch if needed. What patch set does Kay need it for? I have no objection for you to take it through the workqueue tree: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists