[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP136685qRguL6C91C+NE7GbgrU7CdpQJW89Fi-_Vw6EukA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:00:18 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com,
zab@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register()
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:57:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hey, guys.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had
>> > > much time to think about this.
>> > >
>> > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me.
>> >
>> > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of
>> > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that
>> > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way,
>>
>> How should this be routed? I can take it but Kay needs it too so
>> workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a
>> separate branch if needed.
>
> What patch set does Kay need it for? I have no objection for you to
> take it through the workqueue tree:
The dbus bus has the same issues and needs the devices put under
virtual/ and not the devices/ root.
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists