[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363024753.31506.66.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:59:13 +0800
From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] genirq: Give warning in case calling irq_set_irq_wake
with _NO_SUSPEND flag
When one irq is setup with flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it is pointless
to call irq_set_irq_wake().
Because check_wakeup_irqs() is just checking the irq which has pending
but is in IRQS_SUSPENDED state when do syscore_suspend().
Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index fa17855..94c5af9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -513,6 +513,14 @@ int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
if (!desc)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Checking if the flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is set,
+ * if set, drivers do not need to call irq_set_irq_wake(),
+ * it is pointless.
+ */
+ if (!desc->action || (desc->action->flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND))
+ WARN(1, "IRQ %d with flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, no need to call here\n",
+ irq);
+
/* wakeup-capable irqs can be shared between drivers that
* don't need to have the same sleep mode behaviors.
*/
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists