[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311113303.GB12193@osiris>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:33:03 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@...il.com>, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
linux390@...ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: replace kmalloc + memset with kzalloc
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@...il.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > index 0972e91..e645528 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > @@ -747,10 +747,9 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
> >
> > if (!bpf_jit_enable)
> > return;
> > - addrs = kmalloc(fp->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + addrs = kzalloc(fp->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> kcalloc() might be more appropriate here to protect against integer
> overflow if "fp->len" is too large.
Stelian, care to send an updated patch which uses kcalloc()
instead of kzalloc()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists