[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPgLHd-SZw14C_jDYrGNyYWJ7XafX--NEaF9+QofAcm9CuFK_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:08:12 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
horms+renesas@...ge.net.au
Cc: yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -next] sh-pfc: fix return value check in sh_pfc_register_pinctrl()
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
In case of error, the function pinctrl_register() returns
NULL not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
check should be replaced with NULL test.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
---
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
index 11e0e13..271e2c1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
@@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ int sh_pfc_register_pinctrl(struct sh_pfc *pfc)
return ret;
pmx->pctl = pinctrl_register(&sh_pfc_pinctrl_desc, pfc->dev, pmx);
- if (IS_ERR(pmx->pctl))
- return PTR_ERR(pmx->pctl);
+ if (!pmx->pctl)
+ return -EINVAL;
sh_pfc_gpio_range.npins = pfc->info->last_gpio
- pfc->info->first_gpio + 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists