[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3676378.u1106u4Bhi@avalon>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:47:17 +0100
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>, horms+renesas@...ge.net.au
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sh-pfc: fix return value check in sh_pfc_register_pinctrl()
Hi Wei,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 11 March 2013 22:08:12 Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
>
> In case of error, the function pinctrl_register() returns
> NULL not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
> check should be replaced with NULL test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
I've taken the patch in my tree and will push it to v3.10.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c index 11e0e13..271e2c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> @@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ int sh_pfc_register_pinctrl(struct sh_pfc *pfc)
> return ret;
>
> pmx->pctl = pinctrl_register(&sh_pfc_pinctrl_desc, pfc->dev, pmx);
> - if (IS_ERR(pmx->pctl))
> - return PTR_ERR(pmx->pctl);
> + if (!pmx->pctl)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> sh_pfc_gpio_range.npins = pfc->info->last_gpio
> - pfc->info->first_gpio + 1;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists