[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311215402.GD9138@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:54:02 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Mirsal Ennaime <mirsal@...sal.fr>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drivers: android: binder: Fix code style
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:31:53PM +0100, Mirsal Ennaime wrote:
> @@ -2943,28 +2944,39 @@ static void binder_deferred_release(struct binder_proc *proc)
>
> threads = 0;
> active_transactions = 0;
> +
The blank line here isn't really appropriate. The initialization is
logically a part of the loop. It's part of the same paragraph.
> while ((n = rb_first(&proc->threads))) {
> - struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> + struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n,
> + struct binder_thread,
> + rb_node);
Do this instead:
struct binder_thread *thread;
thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> +
> threads++;
> active_transactions += binder_free_thread(proc, thread);
> }
> +
> nodes = 0;
> incoming_refs = 0;
> +
> while ((n = rb_first(&proc->nodes))) {
> - struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n, struct binder_node, rb_node);
> + struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n,
> + struct binder_node,
> + rb_node);
>
Same thing again.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists