[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311180229.GI13679@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:02:30 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] perf: Fix vmalloc ring buffer free function
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:44:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:43 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > I did not know there were other plans for that, seemed useless
>
> I like to keep form, confuses me less :-)
ook
>
> Anyway, why are we getting to that part of perf_output_begin() if we
> don't have any data pages to begin with? Shouldn't we bail before there
> someplace? Like at the !rb->nr_pages check?
>
perf_output_begin actually does the !rb->nr_pages check
looks like we could check it earlier in some casese, I'll
update my todo list ;-)
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists