linux-kernel - Re: request line field in the generic slave config structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201303181330.00610.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:30:00 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
To:	"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: request line field in the generic slave config structure

On Monday 18 March 2013, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> It seems the one (as I think good) question was left unanswered:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg186120.html
> 
> What is your opinions, comments?

I'm not sure I understand what the question was. Is this about
whether we should remove the "slave_id" field in the slave
configuration?

Those sort of duplicate the request line information that comes
from the platform in a data structure that should be filled by
the device driver without platform specific knowledge.

I believe that is currently used by shmobile, and we won't be able
to kill that before that platform has been converted to use
dma_request_slave_channel.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/