[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321101059.GQ10326@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:40:59 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
Cc: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: request line field in the generic slave config structure
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:30:29PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > It seems the one (as I think good) question was left unanswered:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg186120.html
> >
> > What is your opinions, comments?
>
> I'm not sure I understand what the question was. Is this about
> whether we should remove the "slave_id" field in the slave
> configuration?
Ditto :)
The slave_id memeber in dma_slave_config should be used for this
>
> Those sort of duplicate the request line information that comes
> from the platform in a data structure that should be filled by
> the device driver without platform specific knowledge.
>
> I believe that is currently used by shmobile, and we won't be able
> to kill that before that platform has been converted to use
> dma_request_slave_channel.
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists