[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y5dkht4k.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:10:35 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Add a test case for checking sw clock event frequency
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:42:43 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:41:47AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> +static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
>> +{
>> + int i, err = -1;
>> + volatile int tmp = 0;
>> + u64 total_periods = 0;
>> + int nr_samples = 0;
>> + union perf_event *event;
>> + struct perf_evsel *evsel;
>> + struct perf_evlist *evlist;
>> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {
>> + .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
>> + .config = clock_id,
>> + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD,
>> + .exclude_kernel = 1,
>> + .disabled = 1,
>> + .freq = 1,
>> + .sample_freq = 10000,
>> + };
>
> In some compilers we get:
>
> tests/sw-clock.c: In function ‘__test__sw_clock_freq’:
> tests/sw-clock.c:35: error: unknown field ‘sample_freq’ specified in initializer
>
> So I'm moving the initialization to outside the struct named initialization block, i.e.:
>
> @@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
> .exclude_kernel = 1,
> .disabled = 1,
> .freq = 1,
> - .sample_freq = 10000,
> };
>
> + attr.sample_freq = 10000;
> +
>
Thanks for fixing this!
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists