lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130319051147.GC8858@lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:11:48 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] correct load_balance()

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:56:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:48:33PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
> > But, there are some missing parts for this feature to work properly.
> > This patchset correct these things and make load_balance() robust.
> > 
> > Others are related to LBF_ALL_PINNED. This is fallback functionality
> > when all tasks can't be moved as cpu affinity. But, currently,
> > if imbalance is not large enough to task's load, we leave LBF_ALL_PINNED
> > flag and 'redo' is triggered. This is not our intention, so correct it.
> > 
> > These are based on v3.8-rc7.
> > 
> > Joonsoo Kim (8):
> >   sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance()
> >   sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()
> >   sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE
> >   sched: clean up move_task() and move_one_task()
> >   sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead
> >   sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_cpu_active
> >   sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance()
> >   sched: reset lb_env when redo in load_balance()
> > 
> >  kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++--
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c |  107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> Hello, Ingo and Peter.
> 
> Could you review this patch set?
> Please let me know what I should do for merging this?

Hello.
One more ping :)

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > -- 
> > 1.7.9.5
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ