lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130319182810.GA13003@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:28:10 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: pull NV+BS variables out before we exit boot
 services

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:23:31PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:

> The scheme we discussed, unless something radically changed, was to
> convey a temporary key pair via a mechanism to later verify the
> hybernate kernel on a resume.  That only requires reboot safe knowledge
> of the public key.  The private key can be conveyed in BS only (not NV),
> and should be consumed (as in deleted) by the OS when it receives it, so
> it wouldn't be exposed by this patch.

It requires the key to survive the system being entirely powered down, 
which means it needs to be BS+NV. It shouldn't be possible for userspace 
to access this key.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ