linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: remove unused "config BITS"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130319.163021.554696658570846637.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pebolle@...cali.nl
Cc:	sam@...nborg.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: remove unused "config BITS"

From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:26:08 +0100

> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 21:14 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > So $(BITS) is set depending on whether CONFIG_SPARC32 is set or not.
>> > Using $(BITS) in sparc's Makefiles is not using CONFIG_BITS. That
>> > doesn't count as usage of "config BITS". 
>> Just double checked - you are right.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> Maybe send a v2 with this info in changelog and add my:
>> 
>> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> 
> David: should I send a second version with a line or two on the
> (non-related) use of BITS in the Makefiles and Sam's ACK?

Like I replied to Sam, no need, I took care of this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/