[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51496430.6000804@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:24:32 +0800
From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
JBottomley@...allels.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
vsrinivas@...101.org, digitaleric@...gle.com, mikew@...gle.com,
Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support
On 03/20/2013 09:46 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> This looks pretty good!
>
> I rather like the (lack of) locking in I/O completion (around the req
> count vs. target/queue binding). It is unfortunate that you need to hold the per-target lock in virtscsi_pick_vq() though; have any idea
> how much that lock hurts?
Paolo?
>
> Just two minor comments:
>
> (in struct virtio_scsi_target_data):
> + /* This spinlock never help at the same time as vq_lock. */
> ^^^^ held?
>
> (in struct virtio_scsi):
> + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
> Could you rephrase that, please?
Thank you, fixed in V6, please review.
>
> Tested on qemu and w/ Google Compute Engine's virtio-scsi device.
Cool.
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
Do you mind review and test the V6? Thank you.
Regards,
Wanlong Gao
>
> Thanks,
> -- vs;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists