linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:51:37 -0400
From:	wfp5p@...idian.itc.virginia.edu (Bill Pemberton)
To:	jslaby@...e.cz (Jiri Slaby)
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au (Stephen Rothwell), greg@...ah.com (Greg KH),
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree

Jiri Slaby writes:
> 
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c: In function 'qt2_process_read_urb': 
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c:661:18: error: 'struct
> > qt2_port_private' has no member named 'is_open' 
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c:705:15: error: 'struct
> > qt2_port_private' has no member named 'is_open'
> > 
> > Caused by commit e4408ce3c23f ("TTY: quatech2, remove unneeded 
> > is_open").  grep is your friend (or searching while editting the
> > file).
> 
> I think this is caused by another commit. Bill added a check for
> is_open meanwhile I removed that member completely. Bill, could you
> fix that up, please?
> 

Is it legal to call tty_flip_buffer_push() without an open tty?  If
so, I can get rid of the is_open logic completely.  Otherwise, I need
to either keep is_open or otherwise check for a valid tty before
calling tty_flip_buffer_push().

-- 
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/