[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130320125137.EDCD3802B0@viridian.itc.virginia.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:51:37 -0400
From: wfp5p@...idian.itc.virginia.edu (Bill Pemberton)
To: jslaby@...e.cz (Jiri Slaby)
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au (Stephen Rothwell), greg@...ah.com (Greg KH),
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
Jiri Slaby writes:
>
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c: In function 'qt2_process_read_urb':
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c:661:18: error: 'struct
> > qt2_port_private' has no member named 'is_open'
> > drivers/usb/serial/quatech2.c:705:15: error: 'struct
> > qt2_port_private' has no member named 'is_open'
> >
> > Caused by commit e4408ce3c23f ("TTY: quatech2, remove unneeded
> > is_open"). grep is your friend (or searching while editting the
> > file).
>
> I think this is caused by another commit. Bill added a check for
> is_open meanwhile I removed that member completely. Bill, could you
> fix that up, please?
>
Is it legal to call tty_flip_buffer_push() without an open tty? If
so, I can get rid of the is_open logic completely. Otherwise, I need
to either keep is_open or otherwise check for a valid tty before
calling tty_flip_buffer_push().
--
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists