[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51490CC8.80903@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:11:36 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
On 03/19/2013 06:07 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Yeah, I'd like the option of relaxing restrictions when drivers explicitly opt in based on iommu support.
When drivers opt in they can provide an interface. The interesting case
becomes non-drivers.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists