linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio tree relatred)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5149D8AB.7020101@slimlogic.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:41:31 +0000
From:	Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio
 tree relatred)

On 20/03/13 15:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:42 +0800 Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c: In function 'palmas_gpio_probe':
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c:173:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_palmas_charger' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-palmas.c:173:30: error: 'struct palmas' has no member named 'product_id'
>>>
>>> Caused by commit 82d4d6637fdf ("gpio/palmas: add in GPIO support for
>>> palmas charger").  I wonder if this was ever build tested. :-(
>>
>> Probably not. Looks like this driver doesn't get enabled without the
>> associated option in MFD. I didn't go searching for it, so my build
>> tests didn't catch it. I'll drop the patch from my tree. Sorry for the
>> pain.
>
> I am still having to revert this commit ....  :-(
>

Sorry Stephen  - There's a new patch series, that should resolve this, 
undergoing review at the moment so that patch should be reverted...
for now.


Regards,

Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/