[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514A06B8.9060808@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:58:00 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)
On 03/20/13 11:56, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf64':
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c:349:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'merge_note_headers_elf32':
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c:470:22: error: 'VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> make[3]: *** [fs/proc/vmcore.o] Error 1
>>
>>
>> Needs to #include <linux/kexec.h>
>>
>
> I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.
> The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is
> meaningless.
Thanks. I meant to check on CONFIG_KEXEC and then forgot to do that.
> This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end
> of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree. I've added the patch's
> author and Andrew to the cc.
>
> How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?
> --
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists