[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514A233F.8010105@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:59:43 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC: balbi@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rob@...dley.net, davem@...emloft.net,
cesarb@...arb.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony@...mide.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, b-cousson@...com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
eballetbo@...il.com, javier@...hile0.org, mchehab@...hat.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
swarren@...dia.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: dts: omap: update usb_otg_hs data
On 03/20/2013 03:12 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Updated the usb_otg_hs dt data to include the *phy* and *phy-names*
> binding in order for the driver to use the new generic PHY framework.
> Also updated the Documentation to include the binding information.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
> index abce256..3d6f9f6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ OMAP MUSB GLUE
> - power : Should be "50". This signifies the controller can supply upto
> 100mA when operating in host mode.
> - usb-phy : the phandle for the PHY device
> + - phy : the phandle for the PHY device (used by generic PHY framework)
> + - phy-names : the names of the PHY corresponding to the PHYs present in the
> + *phy* phandle.
If the intent is for those properties to be generic and used by any DT
binding that refers to a PHY node, I think you'd want to define those
properties in e.g. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy.txt, just
like common clock/GPIO/... properties are defined in standalone common
files.
I think you want to require that DT nodes that represent PHYs have a
#phy-cells property, and that the format of the phy property be
<&phy_phandle phy_specifier*>, where #phy-cells in the referenced node
defines how many cells are part of phy_specifier*, just like (almost)
any other DT property that references another node by phandle. That way,
if a single DT node represents a HW block that implements e.g. 3 PHYs,
it can use #phy-cells = <1>, and the referencing phy property can
include a cell that indicates which of those 3 PHYs is being referenced.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists