[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514A39E3.6090501@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:36:19 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC: balbi@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rob@...dley.net,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, eballetbo@...il.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
swarren@...dia.com, javier@...hile0.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, cesarb@...arb.net,
mchehab@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework
Hi Kishon,
On 03/20/2013 10:12 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The PHY framework provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers to
> create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to the
> PHY with or without using phandle. To obtain a reference to the PHY without
> using phandle, the platform specfic intialization code (say from board file)
> should have already called phy_bind with the binding information. The binding
> information consists of phy's device name, phy user device name and an index.
> The index is used when the same phy user binds to mulitple phys.
>
> PHY drivers should create the PHY by passing phy_descriptor that has
> describes the PHY (label, type etc..) and ops like init, exit, suspend, resume,
> poweron, shutdown.
>
> The documentation for the generic PHY framework is added in
> Documentation/phy.txt and the documentation for the sysfs entry is added
> in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-phy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@...com>
> ---
[...]
> +static inline struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, int index)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
Shouldn't these be -ENOSYS ? EOPNOTSUPP is defined by POSIX as
"Operation not supported on socket". And EOPNOTSUPP appears to be
mostly used in the network code in the kernel.
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct phy *devm_phy_get(struct device *dev, int index)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct phy *of_phy_get(struct device *dev, int index)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct phy *devm_of_phy_get(struct device *dev, int index)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct phy *of_phy_get_byname(struct device *dev,
> + const char *string)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct phy *devm_of_phy_get_byname(struct device *dev,
> + const char *string)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists