[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130321172334.068a89406c4dede83d3e9c66@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:23:34 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (linus'
tree related)
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h:33:0,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c:67:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:65:20: error: field 'pte' has incomplete type
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:69:18: error: field 'vcpu' has incomplete type
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:98:34: error: 'HPTEG_HASH_NUM_PTE' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:99:39: error: 'HPTEG_HASH_NUM_PTE_LONG' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:100:35: error: 'HPTEG_HASH_NUM_VPTE' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:101:40: error: 'HPTEG_HASH_NUM_VPTE_LONG' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:129:4: error: 'struct kvm_run' declared inside parameter list [-Werror]
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h:129:4: error: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [-Werror]
And it went downhill form there. This build does not have CONFIG_KVM
defined.
Caused by commit f445f11eb2cc ("KVM: allow host header to be included
even for !CONFIG_KVM") which clearly never saw the light of day in
linux-next :-(
It would have been nice if the "compile failure when KVM is not enabled"
was included in the commit log so that we could figure out exactly what
needed to be protected instead of just effectively removing the whole
file.
I just reverted that commit for today. Can someone please supply a
better solution or even just more information about what that commit was
solving.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists