[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514AA74D.9070506@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:53:09 +0530
From: kishon <kishon@...com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rob@...dley.net>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <cesarb@...arb.net>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
<b-cousson@...com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<eballetbo@...il.com>, <javier@...hile0.org>, <mchehab@...hat.com>,
<santosh.shilimkar@...com>, <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: dts: omap: update usb_otg_hs data
Hi,
On Thursday 21 March 2013 02:29 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 03:12 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Updated the usb_otg_hs dt data to include the *phy* and *phy-names*
>> binding in order for the driver to use the new generic PHY framework.
>> Also updated the Documentation to include the binding information.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
>> index abce256..3d6f9f6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt
>> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ OMAP MUSB GLUE
>> - power : Should be "50". This signifies the controller can supply upto
>> 100mA when operating in host mode.
>> - usb-phy : the phandle for the PHY device
>> + - phy : the phandle for the PHY device (used by generic PHY framework)
>> + - phy-names : the names of the PHY corresponding to the PHYs present in the
>> + *phy* phandle.
>
> If the intent is for those properties to be generic and used by any DT
> binding that refers to a PHY node, I think you'd want to define those
> properties in e.g. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy.txt, just
> like common clock/GPIO/... properties are defined in standalone common
> files.
Ok. Will add it.
>
> I think you want to require that DT nodes that represent PHYs have a
> #phy-cells property, and that the format of the phy property be
> <&phy_phandle phy_specifier*>, where #phy-cells in the referenced node
> defines how many cells are part of phy_specifier*, just like (almost)
> any other DT property that references another node by phandle. That way,
> if a single DT node represents a HW block that implements e.g. 3 PHYs,
> it can use #phy-cells = <1>, and the referencing phy property can
> include a cell that indicates which of those 3 PHYs is being referenced.
Currently, if a single phandle have reference to multiple PHYs, we can
get PHY by passing index or by name as give in phy-names.
I'm not sure if we have <&phy_phandle phy_specifier*>, what could that
phy_specifier be? Maybe phy_type?
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists