linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb host: Faraday FUSBH200 HCD driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADB-GoKACxJCNqj3OsQdgmWoK3y-hgbiLoCBzA7kbcJ3rMoheA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:35:54 +0800
From:	Yuan-Hsin Chen <yuanlmm@...il.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yuan-Hsin Chen <yhchen@...aday-tech.com>,
	john453@...aday-tech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb host: Faraday FUSBH200 HCD driver.

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Yuan-Hsin Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Yuan-Hsin Chen wrote:
>> >
>> >> > What about the port_status registers?  They're not between command and
>> >> > async_next.  If they aren't consistent with EHCI, it makes things a lot
>> >> > more complicated.
>> >>
>> >> fusbh200 has only one port_status register with different offset,
>> >> 0x30, and the position of some bits are different from EHCI.
>>
>> How about adding kernel configuration to adjust offset for FUSBH200 in
>> ehci_def.h? So port_status would be in offset 0x20 from ehci_regs.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>>         /* ASYNCLISTADDR: offset 0x18 */
>>         u32             async_next;     /* address of next async queue head */
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_FUSBH200
>>         u32             reserved1[2];
>>
>>         /* TXFILLTUNING: offset 0x24 */
>>         u32             txfill_tuning;  /* TX FIFO Tuning register */
>> #define TXFIFO_DEFAULT  (8<<16)         /* FIFO burst threshold 8 */
>>
>>         u32             reserved2[6];
>>
>>         /* CONFIGFLAG: offset 0x40 */
>>         u32             configured_flag;
>> #define FLAG_CF         (1<<0)          /* true: we'll support "high speed" */
>>
>> #else
>>         u32             reserved1;
>> #endif
>>         /* PORTSC: offset 0x44 */
>>         u32             port_status[0]; /* up to N_PORTS */
>
> This is acceptable _only_ if it is not possible to use an FUSBH200
> controller in the same computer as a normal EHCI controller.
>
>> Furthermore, there are PORT_POWER, PORT_OWNER, PORT_LED_XXX,
>> PORT_TEST, PORT_WKCONN_E, PORT_WKDISC_E, PORT_WKOC_E absent in
>> port_status of FUSBH200. Also PORT_OC and PORT_OCC are in another
>> register. Is it ok to use quirk flag also?
>
> Yes, those can be handled by a quirk flag.  Does the FUSBH200 have a
> built-in Transaction Translator?

Yes, the FUSBH200 has built-in Transaction Translator.

I will modify the driver based on what we discussed before and re-submit it.
Thank you for your time.

>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/