[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1RGDVnkLZU2Vge4o3BwDxnAfGv7TQRMqE6ha3MUt39CVp5NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:13:38 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma: don't make pages writeable if not requiested
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>> In that case, no, I don't see any reason for LOCAL_WRITE, since the
>> only RDMA operations that will access this memory are remote reads.
>
> What is the meaning of LOCAL_WRITE then? There are no local
> RDMA writes as far as I can see.
Umm, it means you're giving the local adapter permission to write to
that memory. So you can use it as a receive buffer or as the target
for remote data from an RDMA read operation.
> OK then what we need is a new flag saying "I really do not
> intend to write into this memory please do not break
> COW or do anything else just in case I do".
Isn't that a shared read-only mapping?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists