[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321091531.GN20530@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:15:31 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: divider: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 07:50:51PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:32:51AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > If the caller
> > doesn't like the returned frequency he can request a different one.
> > And he's eventually happy with the return value he calls
> > clk_set_rate() requesting the frequency clk_round_rate() returned.
> > Always rounding down seems a bit odd to me.
> >
> > Another issue with the current implmentation:
> > clk_divider_round_rate() calls clk_divider_bestdiv(), which uses the ROUND_UP macro, returning a rather low frequency.
>
> And that is correct. clk_divider_bestdiv is used to calculate the
> maximum parent frequency for which a given divider value does not
> exceed the desired rate.
The reason for that is that the (more?) usual constraint is like: This
mmc card can handle up to 100 MHz. Or this i2c device can handle up to
this and that frequency. Of course there are different constraints, e.g.
for a UART if the target baud speed is 38400 you better run at 38402
than at 19201.
I wonder if it depends on the clock if you want "best approximation <=
requested value" or "best approximation" or on the caller. In the former
case a flag for the clock would be the right thing (as suggested in this
thread). If however it's the caller of round_rate who knows better which
rounding is preferred than better extend the clk API.
Extending the API could just be a convenience function that doesn't
affect the implementations of the clk API. E.g.:
long clk_round_rate_nearest(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
{
long lower_limit = clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
long upper_limit = clk_round_rate(clk, rate + (rate - lower_limit));
if (rate - lower_limit < upper_limit - rate)
return lower_limit;
else
return upper_limit;
}
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists