[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363830108.31336.83.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:41:48 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: "Sebastian Gottschall (DD-WRT)" <s.gottschall@...wrt.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ 12/48] signal: always clear sa_restorer on execve
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 21:43 +0100, Sebastian Gottschall (DD-WRT) wrote:
> Am 20.03.2013 20:02, schrieb Sebastian Gottschall (DD-WRT):
> > Hello
> >
> > The patch for sa_restorer will break mips builds, since sa_restorer
> > isnt defined as field within the struct, but the MACRO is.
> > so use the __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER way which is implemented in that way
> > in linux 3.9 or simply revert the patch
This also appears to break blackfin, ia64, parisc and tile.
I think for earlier 3.x.y series we can use one of the attached
(untested) patches to define __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER appropriately, and
then apply the upstream change:
commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed Mar 13 14:59:34 2013 -0700
kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.
View attachment "signal-fix-use-of-missing-sa_restorer-field-3.0-3.2-3.4.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4436 bytes)
View attachment "signal-fix-use-of-missing-sa_restorer-field-3.8.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4380 bytes)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists