[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130322101211.34A5EE0085@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:12:11 +0200 (EET)
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introduce
mapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
> > + return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP
> getting _set_ anywhere. Am I missing something?
__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists