[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <234906745c34fb72b0c450d897f261a22ed18d40.1363947023.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:43:52 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: arvind.chauhan@....com, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
charles.garcia-tobin@....com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: do cpufreq_cpu_put() corresponding to cpufreq_cpu_get
In cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs() we aren't balancing calls to cpufreq_cpu_get()
with cpufreq_cpu_put(). This will never let us have ref count to policy->kobj as
zero.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 2fd779e..bfd6273 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -180,15 +180,19 @@ static void cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- if (!cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu))
+ if (!policy)
return;
- if (policy && !policy_is_shared(policy)) {
+ if (!cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu))
+ goto put_ref;
+
+ if (!policy_is_shared(policy)) {
pr_debug("%s: Free sysfs stat\n", __func__);
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
}
- if (policy)
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+
+put_ref:
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
static int cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists