[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322131337.GA7016@bandura.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:13:37 +0100
From: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com, Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] uretprobes: implemented, thus remove -ENOSYS
please disregard this one, not sure how it managed to hide within
the rest ones...
sry,
Anton.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Anton Arapov wrote:
> enclose return probes implementation
>
> v3 changes: (the patch is introduced in v3)
> - remove 'TODO' as return probes implemented now
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 5fb7809..e13f9f8 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -840,10 +840,6 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
> if (!uc->handler && !uc->rp_handler)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* TODO: Implement return probes */
> - if (uc->rp_handler)
> - return -ENOSYS;
> -
> /* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
> if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists