[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322150252.GA17934@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:02:52 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com, Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare_uretprobe()
I'll try to read this series later. Just one note...
On 03/22, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> IOW, we must ensure that uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() can't return 0.
Yes, but I do not see this change?
> +static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct return_instance *ri;
> + struct uprobe_task *utask;
> + struct xol_area *area;
> + unsigned long trampoline_vaddr;
> + unsigned long prev_ret_vaddr, ret_vaddr;
> +
> + area = get_xol_area();
> + if (!area)
> + return;
> +
> + utask = get_utask();
> + if (!utask)
> + return;
> +
> + prev_ret_vaddr = -1;
> + if (utask->return_instances)
> + prev_ret_vaddr = utask->return_instances->orig_ret_vaddr;
> +
> + ri = kzalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ri)
> + return;
> +
> + ri->dirty = false;
> + trampoline_vaddr = get_trampoline_vaddr(area);
> + ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, regs);
OK, but you need to ensure that this code can be compiled on poweprc.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists