[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322151034.GC17286@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:10:34 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com, Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] uretprobes: return probes implementation
On 03/22, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> this is core implementation of the uretprobes. This enables a breakpoint
> on function's return for the tools such as perf.
And, before we ask Ingo to pull, we should teach trace_uprobe.c to handle
"perf -x func%return".
This looks simple, but probably we need to add the additional "ulong bp_vaddr"
argument for rp_handler().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists