lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVPLkaoowZJZdrg3nkm7ymismJ6W=_BzgyroKJOxJYPODA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:45:29 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: fix race between readdir and lseek

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote:
>> Considered that vfs_read()/vfs_write on sysfs dir is almost doing nothing, the
>> above problem may only exist in theory.
>
> The read() vs readdir() race in sysfs directory doesn't exist in theory only.

Could you let me know if you have applied the two patches on your test?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=e5110f411d2ee35bf8d202ccca2e89c633060dca

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=991f76f837bf22c5bb07261cfd86525a0a96650c

Also I appreciate it if you may share your test case...

Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ