lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:03:31 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: fix race between readdir and lseek

Hi Zefan,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote:
>>> Considered that vfs_read()/vfs_write on sysfs dir is almost doing nothing, the
>>> above problem may only exist in theory.
>>
>> The read() vs readdir() race in sysfs directory doesn't exist in theory only.
>
> Could you let me know if you have applied the two patches on your test?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=e5110f411d2ee35bf8d202ccca2e89c633060dca
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=991f76f837bf22c5bb07261cfd86525a0a96650c
>
> Also I appreciate it if you may share your test case...

If you mean the test code on link[1], I can't reproduce the
warning with the two sysfs fix patches in 4 hours's test.

[1], https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2160771/

Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists