linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Synchronize gcmd value with global command register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:31:22 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Synchronize gcmd value with global command
 register

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:02:44PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> The root cause of this problem is mismatch between iommu->gcmd and
> global command register in the case of kdump. At boot time, initial
> value of iommu->gcmd is zero as I wrote above, but actual global command
> register is *not* zero because some bits like IRE/TE/QIE are already set
> in *first* kernel. Therefore this patch synchronize them to fix this
> problem.

Ok, I understand, but I still don't see why this is a problem. There is
no point for the kdump kernel to preserve hardware state from the
previous kernel. So I think the way it is implemented is correct.


	Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/