[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51527D74.9080209@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:02:44 +0900
From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
To: joro@...tes.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Synchronize gcmd value with global command
register
(2013/03/26 23:46), Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:32:36AM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
>> In this function, clearing IRE bit in iommu->gcmd and writing it to
>> global command register. But initial value of iommu->gcmd is zero, so
>> this writel means clearing all bits in global command register.
>
> Seems weird. Why is the value of gcmd zero in your case? The usage of
> this register is well encapsulated by the different parts of the VT-d
> driver. There are other places which enable/disable translation and qpi
> the same way it is done with interrupt remapping. So it looks to me that
> it is unlikely that gcmd is really zero in your case.
>
> Can you explain that more and also describe what the actual misbehavior
> is you are trying to fix here?
Sure.
At first, please see the debug patch below.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
index af8904d..3ffb029 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
@@ -484,12 +484,15 @@ static void iommu_disable_irq_remapping(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
if (!(sts & DMA_GSTS_IRES))
goto end;
+ printk("DEBUG1: %08x\n", sts);
+
iommu->gcmd &= ~DMA_GCMD_IRE;
writel(iommu->gcmd, iommu->reg + DMAR_GCMD_REG);
IOMMU_WAIT_OP(iommu, DMAR_GSTS_REG,
readl, !(sts & DMA_GSTS_IRES), sts);
+ printk("DEBUG2: %08x\n", sts);
end:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->register_lock, flags);
}
This is the result in *kdump* kernel(second kernel).
DEBUG1: c7000000
DEBUG2: 41000000
After writel, TES/QIES/IRES is disabled. I think only IRES should be
disabled here because this function is "iommu_disable_irq_remapping".
TES and QIES should be disabled by iommu_disable_translation() and
dmar_disable_qi() respectively.
This is what I found and what I am trying to fix. Next, let's see what
happened at boot time. Again, I'm talking about *kdump* kernel boot
time.
1. dmar_table_init() is called, and intel_iommu structure is allocated in
alloc_iommu().
int alloc_iommu(struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd)
{
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
(snip)
iommu = kzalloc(sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
iommu->gcmd is zero here.
2. intel_enable_irq_remapping() is called, and interrupt remapping is
initialized.
static int __init intel_enable_irq_remapping(void)
{
(snip)
for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) {
struct intel_iommu *iommu = drhd->iommu;
(snip)
iommu_disable_irq_remapping(iommu);
iommu_disable_irq_remapping is called here. Note that iommu->gcmd is
still zero because anyone doesn't touch it yet.
static void iommu_disable_irq_remapping(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
{
(snip)
sts = dmar_readq(iommu->reg + DMAR_GSTS_REG);
if (!(sts & DMA_GSTS_IRES))
goto end;
iommu->gcmd &= ~DMA_GCMD_IRE;
writel(iommu->gcmd, iommu->reg + DMAR_GCMD_REG);
The purpose of this code is clearing IRE bit of global command
register to disable interrupt remapping, right?
But as I wrote above, iommu->gcmd is always zero here at boot time. So
this code means claring *all* bit of global command register. As the
result of this, both of TE and QIE are also disabled.
The root cause of this problem is mismatch between iommu->gcmd and
global command register in the case of kdump. At boot time, initial
value of iommu->gcmd is zero as I wrote above, but actual global command
register is *not* zero because some bits like IRE/TE/QIE are already set
in *first* kernel. Therefore this patch synchronize them to fix this
problem.
Did I answer your question?
Thanks,
Takao Indoh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists