lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:28:56 +0900
From:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To:	jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: do not skip writing file meta during fsync

2013/3/27, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>:
> 2013-03-27 (수), 09:57 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
>> 2013/3/27, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>:
>> > 2013-03-26 (화), 09:48 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
>> >> 2013/3/25, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>:
>> >> > This patch removes data_version check flow during the fsync call.
>> >> > The original purpose for the use of data_version was to avoid writng
>> >> > inode
>> >> > pages redundantly by the fsync calls repeatedly.
>> >> Hi Jaegeuk.
>> >> > However, when user can modify file meta and then call fsync, we
>> >> > should
>> >> > not
>> >> > skip fsync procedure.
>> >> I have a question.
>> >> Which case does user can directly modify meta ? Recovery tool ?
>> >
>> > The meta means the inode information like atime, mtime, size, and so
>> > on,
>> > which can be modified by setattr() or something other vfs apis.
>> > Thanks,
>> I understood. Thanks for your explanation :)
>> One more,,
>> When inode state is  !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)), We don't need to skip
>> ?
>
> Even though fsync writes no data and the inode is clean, we should mark
> the inode to recover after power-off-recovery.
> Any data and its inode can be written to the disk clearly before fsync
> was called.
Okay, Clear.
Thanks Jaegeuk!

> Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> > So, let's remove this condition check and hope that user triggers in
>> >> > right
>> >> > manner.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
>> >> --
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> >> linux-kernel"
>> >> in
>> >> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jaegeuk Kim
>> > Samsung
>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists