[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSSBdzGJtJ6HLFCM_Hhnwv1ASZ=JCX+zpWcM5X3KwZk6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:48:15 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/18] perf tools: add mem access sampling core support
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:14 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > we have correct cpumode for sample->ip, but I think it's the
> > > PEBS->dla (sample->addr) where we need to guess.. right?
> >
> > kernel mode very much fakes the cpumode/segment stuff for PEBS. PEBS
> > assumes you're running in a linear/flat mode.
> >
>
> say we hit the sample when kernel accesses the user data, we will endup
> with IP in kernel space and DATA ptr in user space.. in theory ;-)
>
Yes, this is possible. So I think we could probably leaverage ip__resolve_ams()
and pass the extra parameter for MAP_VARIABLE vs. MAP_FUNCTION.
>
> and that would need the cpumode guessing for DATA ptr, because
> cpumode value is deduced from cs register
>
> jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists