[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130327143437.GE1092@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:34:37 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
acme@...hat.com, namhyung.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/18] perf tools: add mem access sampling core support
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:14 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > we have correct cpumode for sample->ip, but I think it's the
> > PEBS->dla (sample->addr) where we need to guess.. right?
>
> kernel mode very much fakes the cpumode/segment stuff for PEBS. PEBS
> assumes you're running in a linear/flat mode.
>
say we hit the sample when kernel accesses the user data, we will endup
with IP in kernel space and DATA ptr in user space.. in theory ;-)
and that would need the cpumode guessing for DATA ptr, because
cpumode value is deduced from cs register
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists