[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130327143447.GB1771@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:34:47 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fsfreeze: moving from uniterruptible to killable
On Wed 27-03-13 12:39:10, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> 2013/3/26 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> > On Sun 24-03-13 10:10:59, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> >> When a fs is frozen, a process can hang because we wait in
> >> uniterruptible state. We give the user the possibility to kill the process.
> > Yes, but it needs slightly more work as you probably know... (bailing out
> > properly when the signal arrives).
> >
> > Honza
> >
>
> Of course, indeed, it was only an RFC to start a discussion, not a
> patch :) The point was: is this kind of change a behaviour that can
> break user-space in some way? IMHO no, but I'd like to have a
> discussion about that before to start coding. What do you think?
Killable wait is almost always safe WRT to userspace breakage. In this
case I cannot see how it could matter. That's why I agree it's a good thing
to do.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists